Uncoupled Review: Neil Patrick Harris Exposes Himself (Emotionally) in Netflix’s Gay Romantic Comedy

Neil Patrick Harris spent nine seasons playing charming womanizer Barney Stinson on CBS’ How I Met Your Mother, and in his new Netflix comedy Uncoupled, his character Michael also wears nice suits and lives in New York City. But in other ways, Michael is the complete opposite of Barney: a mild-mannered gay man who has been happily coupled up with his boyfriend for the past 17 years. That happiness all comes crashing down, though, and Uncoupled — premiering this Friday; I’ve seen five of the eight episodes — is a mildly enjoyable, surprisingly dramatic look at Michael’s new life as a suddenly single gay man in his 40s.

Uncoupled Netflix Tisha Campbell Neil Patrick HarrisTo everyone else, Michael and his boyfriend Colin (Tuc Watkins) look like the picture-perfect couple, but pictures can be deceiving: Colin abruptly dumps him just as they’re walking into the lavish 50th birthday bash Michael threw for him. (Great timing.) Blindsided and devastated, Michael leans on his friends for support after the breakup: Suzanne (Tisha Campbell), his sassy colleague at a high-end real estate firm, and Billy (Emerson Brooks) and Stanley (Brooks Ashmanskas), his quippy gay pals who love to sip wine and gossip. Plus, Michael strikes up an unlikely bond with his demanding client Claire (Marcia Gay Harden, having a lot of fun here) over their shared heartbreak.

Darren Star created the series along with Modern Family alum Jeffrey Richman, and he seems to be going for the light, bubbly rom-com vibe of his other shows Sex and the City and Emily in Paris. (It’s definitely nice to look at, with lots of beautiful expensive apartments and fabulous parties.) The trailer promises lots of wacky dating hijinks, but that’s actually a bit misleading: Uncoupled is more of a dramedy, with a deep emotional undercurrent as Michael tries to make sense of his pain and grief. Harris plays the devastation well, bringing unexpected depth to the role. The scene where a freshly dumped Michael has to put on a brave face and make a birthday toast to Colin is a remarkable balancing act, and Harris pulls it off with ease.

Uncoupled Netflix Episode 3 Gilles MariniUncoupled is at its best when Michael is dipping his toe in a very different and scary dating pool full of Grindr DMs, dick pics and carefree unprotected sex — a prospect that scares the hell out of him after growing up in the AIDS era. (“I can’t get turned on when all I can see is my name on that quilt,” he explains to his clueless millennial hookup, who replies: “What quilt?”) Michael wants old-fashioned dates and romance, but do those even exist anymore? It’s fertile ground for comedy, but the series prefers to stay focused on Michael’s heartbreak — maybe a little too much. (I get that he wouldn’t get over Colin overnight, but can’t we skip ahead to the fun stuff?)

Watching Uncoupled is a pleasant enough experience, but honestly, I didn’t find myself laughing very much. Outside of Michael and Claire, the characters don’t really stand out or grab our attention, and the punchlines are mostly stale and predictable. I’d love to see a modern-day gay rom-com with the shocking frankness of vintage Sex and the City, but Uncoupled pulls its punches too often; it’s more mild than spicy, even though it airs on a streaming service with zero content restrictions. It’s closer in tone to the later seasons of Sex and the City, when it ventured into dramedy territory, but that was earned by years of great writing and careful character building. Uncoupled could get there — and it’s a solid vehicle for Harris’ talents regardless — but it’s not quite there yet.

THE TVLINE BOTTOM LINE: Neil Patrick Harris is great as a suddenly single gay man in Netflix’s Uncoupled, but the jokes could use a makeover.

Published
Categorized as Reviews

The Rehearsal Review: Nathan Fielder Cooks Up a Wonderfully Weird and Fascinating Social Experiment for HBO

Nathan Fielder’s brand of comedy is not for everyone. From his breakout Comedy Central show Nathan For You to HBO’s tiny gem How To With John Wilson (which he executive-produces), Fielder has perfected a very specific style of awkward, deadpan cringe comedy based on unscripted encounters with unsuspecting real people. Fans of his comedy (including me) have been patiently waiting to see what he’ll do next after Nathan For You ended five years ago, and now we have our answer. Fielder’s new HBO show The Rehearsal — premiering this Friday at 11/10c; I’ve seen five of the six episodes — is bigger, weirder and more thought-provoking than anything he’s done before. In fact, I wouldn’t even classify it as a “comedy” at times, but it’s never less than fascinating.

Nathan Fielder The Rehearsal HBOAs the series begins, Fielder explains that he’s working through his own issues with human interaction (“I’ve been told my personality makes people uncomfortable”), so he posts a Craigslist ad looking for people who’ve been avoiding a big moment or confrontation in their lives. He offers to help them rehearse it until they get it exactly right, hiring actors to stand in for their friends and loved ones, building exact replicas of familiar locations and trying dialogue over and over again to hit upon the perfect formula, with Fielder running through each possible scenario on his laptop. It’s kind of like The Truman Show mixed with that scene in Groundhog Day where Bill Murray keeps fine-tuning his approach to Andie MacDowell to create the perfect first date.

Fielder assists a new participant in each episode, renting a gigantic soundstage to replicate the exact environments where their big life events will take place. For a teacher who wants to confess a lie to his bar trivia buddies, Fielder constructs a perfect clone of the New York City bar where he plays trivia, down to the torn seat cushions on the chairs. For a woman who wants to try out motherhood before taking the plunge, he hires an army of child actors from infants to teenagers to play her kid, with the child aging up three years per week. (What’s more, Fielder has rehearsed his own interactions with the participants beforehand with yet another set of actors to make sure everything goes smoothly on his end.) But life is unpredictable, and Fielder’s own life starts to overlap with the rehearsals in strange ways as his simulated reality loops back on itself and gets uncomfortably real.

The Rehearsal HBO Nathan FielderThe heavy-duty scenario planning that Fielder undertakes to stage these rehearsals is both highly absurd and genuinely jaw-dropping. He dabbled in longer-form stunts on Nathan For You like in Season 4’s super-sized “Finding Frances,” but this is on a completely different level. If nothing else, The Rehearsal is an absolute triumph of set design and logistics. (I couldn’t help but wonder: How much of HBO’s money did he spend on all of this?) It’s admirably audacious, especially for a weird alt-comedy that wouldn’t normally get a budget this size. And along the way, Fielder’s grand social experiment hits upon some profound insights about human nature and why we do the things we do (even if we’ve practiced it a thousand times).

This is all probably not making it sound very funny — but it is! It’s less “ha ha” funny, though, and more “this is a very unusual situation, and I can’t believe what I’m seeing” funny. Some moments are so unbearably awkward that I had to look away. But Fielder mines plenty of laughs from the unpredictable turns his experiments take and the truly eccentric characters he finds. (You know, the type of people who would actually answer a Craigslist ad looking to rehearse a crucial life event.) There were times I wanted The Rehearsal to be more conventionally structured or even more conventionally funny; it gets weirdly poignant at times — or poignantly weird, I’m not sure which — as it walks a fine line between inspired and demented. (One participant’s comparison of Fielder to Willy Wonka isn’t all that far off.) But I can honestly say I’ve seen nothing like it on television before… and I’m glad HBO forked over all that cash to make it happen.

THE TVLINE BOTTOM LINE: Nathan Fielder’s The Rehearsal reimagines his deadpan alt-comedy style on a grand scale, and the results are fascinating.

Published
Categorized as Reviews

The Terminal List Review: Chris Pratt’s Military ‘Thriller’ Is Terminally Bad

Early on in Prime Video’s The Terminal List, Chris Pratt’s Navy SEAL character James Reece is described as someone who’s “built to take a kick to the head.” Those words could easily describe this series, too — although maybe it’s taken a few too many kicks to the head already. A brutally violent and deadly serious military drama-slash-revenge thriller, The Terminal List (premiering this Friday; I’ve seen the first three episodes) is like The Fugitive meets SEAL Team meets a “Don’t Tread on Me” truck decal, with all of the delicacy and nuance that implies. It’s punishingly grim and hopelessly boneheaded… but at least it’s something new for the Amazon algorithm to recommend to your dad after he’s done watching Jack Ryan and Reacher.

The Terminal List Amazon Chris PrattPratt’s Reece is a Navy SEAL commander whose entire platoon gets wiped out in an ambush that ends with a chaotic gunfight in an underground tunnel. A shattered Reece vows revenge on the faceless terrorist leader he holds responsible — I think his name is “Haqqani”? Does it even matter? — while the U.S. military brass investigate what went wrong. But Reece’s hazy memories don’t match the evidence, and he starts to suspect a deep-rooted conspiracy is targeting him for knowing too much. He puts together a list of enemies to wipe out, Arya Stark-style… but can he even trust his own mind?

It’s a pretty basic setup for a paranoid conspiracy thriller, but the scripts from showrunner David DiGilio (Strange Angel, Crossbones) — based on the Jack Carr novel — are woefully short on actual thrills. In their place, we’re served up huge helpings of red-meat masculinity, hardheaded jingoism and heavy-handed symbolism. (Oh, and lots and lots of American flags.) The dialogue is generic, but it’s also besides the point; it’s just a way to move us along to the next action scene. And those action scenes aren’t even all that great!

The Terminal List‘s plot defies logic, if you stop to think about it for even a minute, but it confidently shoves its way past any such concerns. It’s utterly humorless, too, punctuated by crude bursts of graphic violence. Even those aren’t effective, though: The action is bloody but not exciting, and the story is bewildering but not interesting. In between, we get saccharine family scenes and a paint-by-numbers conspiracy that gets more complicated but not any more compelling.

The Terminal List Chris Pratt Riley KeoughThe cast is talented, to be sure, but they’re just going through the motions here. Pratt, so lively and goofy as Andy Dwyer on Parks and Recreation, is stoic to the point of constipation as Reece. Constance Wu has to unload a lot of exposition as nosy reporter Katie, and Taylor Kitsch has great tattoos, at least, as Reece’s military buddy Ben Edwards. It’s sad to see a gifted and versatile actress like Riley Keough stuck playing Reece’s blandly supportive military wife Lauren. It’s also hard to take Sean Gunn, aka Gilmore Girls‘ Kirk, at all seriously as a slimy corporate executive who ends up on Reece’s hit list.

There’s certainly room on TV for a pulse-pounding, thought-provoking conspiracy thriller with lots of action and intrigue — but in the case of The Terminal List, that mission gets badly botched.

THE TVLINE BOTTOM LINE: Save yourself some time and delete Prime Video’s brawny, boneheaded military drama The Terminal List from your watch list.

Published
Categorized as Reviews

Loot Review: Maya Rudolph’s Apple TV+ Comedy Has Banked a Wealth of Talent, But It Doesn’t Quite Pay Off

If anyone can get us to sympathize with a clueless billionaire, it’s Maya Rudolph, right? The SNL alum has been a reliable source of laughs for two solid decades now, and it’s nice to see her get a well-deserved turn in the spotlight with the new Apple TV+ comedy Loot, premiering this Friday (I’ve seen the first five episodes). Loot is a pleasant enough viewing experience, with a few sharp one-liners and a truly top-notch cast. But it’s also slightly disappointing, hampered by repetitive plot dynamics and a confused tone.

Rudolph stars as Molly, a filthy rich wife whose carefree life of luxury comes to a screeching halt when she catches her tech gazillionaire husband (Adam Scott) cheating. Her consolation prize is an eye-popping $87 billion (!) divorce settlement, but it doesn’t help much; if she’s not a rich guy’s wife, Molly doesn’t even know who she is anymore. Aimless and lonely, she gets a call out of the blue from a charity foundation in her name that she didn’t even know existed — and she latches on to it, inspired to clean up her act and put her money to good use, MacKenzie Bezos-style.

Loot Apple Arthur MollyA lot of Loot‘s charm comes directly from Rudolph, who’s such a joyful performer to watch. (Co-creators Alan Yang and Matt Hubbard, from Parks and Rec and 30 Rock, also worked with Rudolph on the unsung Prime Video gem Forever, so they know how to take full advantage of her considerable appeal.) The role of Molly is a tricky one, though: She’s completely tone-deaf and oblivious to the concerns of the less-than-ultra-rich — she thinks residents at a homeless shelter could use solid-gold panini presses — and it’s hard to feel sorry for her, with infinite resources at her disposal. In fact, the show’s whole approach to wealth is a bit muddled and problematic. It can’t decide if it wants to be glossy wish fulfillment or a sobering wake-up call about income inequality, so it tries to do both, making for an awkward clash in tones. No, money can’t buy you happiness… but ooh, look at Molly’s shiny private jet!

Rudolph’s innate warmth does a lot to keep the show afloat, though, and she’s buoyed by a supporting cast loaded with seasoned comedy veterans. Joel Kim Booster gets most of the best punchlines as Molly’s eager assistant Nicholas (“On the scale of ageless Jennifers, you went from Aniston to Lopez,” he tells his boss), and Ron Funches is a lot of fun as Molly’s distant relative Howard, who got a job at the foundation thanks to her. Nat Faxon gives off major Toby-from-The Office vibes as dorky divorced accountant Arthur, and there’s a cute semi-romance brewing between him and Molly. Plus, Pose standout Michaela Jaé Rodriguez gets to show off her comedic skills as the foundation’s idealistic director Sofia.

Loot Apple Michaela Jae Rodriguez SofiaShe’s mostly a one-note stick in the mud, though, and her relationship with Molly quickly gets repetitive. After a promising setup, Loot settles into a rut of familiar sitcom rhythms: Molly does something thoughtless, she scrambles to make up for it, she throws a bunch of money around, Sofia warms up to her a tiny bit, roll credits. (Nicholas and Howard are forced to become friends almost out of narrative necessity, since Molly is usually off somewhere screwing up.) It’s billed as a “workplace comedy,” but since so little of the action actually takes place at the workplace, it’s not much of one.

It’s tough, because there’s so much about this show that I like, but I can’t shake the feeling that I wanted to see something more ambitious and boundary-breaking (and funny!) from a creative team of this caliber. Though there’s still time for Loot to find its footing and take a harder look at its main character, so far it goes down as a missed opportunity.

THE TVLINE BOTTOM LINE: Maya Rudolph gets the starring role she deserves, but her Apple TV+ comedy Loot is disappointingly mediocre.

Published
Categorized as Reviews

The Old Man Review: FX’s Well-Aged Action Drama Has Creaky Bones

Grade CJeff Bridges and John Lithgow are two of our greatest living actors, so it’s exciting to see them paired up as the stars of the new FX thriller The Old Man (debuting Thursday, June 16 at 10/9c). In fact, the promise of Bridges and Lithgow sharing the screen is almost enough on its own to sell this… almost. But after seeing the first four episodes, I’m not completely sold. The Old Man hits all the beats of a standard spy thriller and delivers some bone-crunching action, but the personal stuff falls flat. It strikes a meditative tone, without giving us much to meditate on.

Bridges stars as former CIA asset Dan Chase, who now lives a quiet life in the woods with his two big lumbering dogs. The story starts out slow and ponderous, but it kicks into high gear when Dan is attacked by a mystery assailant. “They found me,” he tells his daughter on the phone as he packs a bag and goes on the run. Lithgow plays FBI higher-up Harold Harper, who’s tasked with bringing Chase in, dusting off a case file that’s been sealed for 30 years.

The Old Man FX John Lithgow Harold HarperThese two actors make a formidable cat-and-mouse duo, in the vein of The Fugitive‘s Harrison Ford and Tommy Lee Jones. Chase and Harper are both smart and well-seasoned, and they have a history, too; the story perks up significantly when they talk. (If anything, they don’t have enough scenes together.) It’s also fun to see Bridges, who’s 72 years young, snap into action-hero mode here, beating up guys half his age and pulling out a sniper rifle to pick off surveillance drones. Chase is not indestructible, though, and his advancing age does play a factor; in the premiere, he gets into an exhaustingly long fistfight with a resilient opponent that even left me gasping for breath.

Trying to follow The Old Man‘s story, however, is exhausting in its own way. Co-creators and writers Jonathan E. Steinberg and Robert Levine (Black Sails, See) — adapting the bestselling novel by Thomas Perry — weave a tangled backstory of international intrigue that spans decades and continents, but doesn’t bother to make sense or get us to care. You want answers? OK, but they just lead to a dozen more questions. The background details are kept frustratingly sketchy, with the actors left to fill in the blanks.

The dialogue is a mix of dense exposition and hard-boiled bravado, with not a lot of humanity to it. It sounds cool, sure, but it doesn’t ring true. The series also gets very dark at times — literally. (I had to squint to see what was happening during several key action sequences.) The flashbacks to Chase’s younger days in the CIA are supposed to let us in on his motivations, but they’re so hackneyed, they’re almost unnecessary. I should note there’s a big twist in Episode 3 that adds an interesting wrinkle to the story, but it makes less sense the more you think about it.

The Old Man FX Amy Brenneman ZoePlus, as good as Bridges and Lithgow are, the women are not well served here. Alia Shawkat doesn’t fit as an eager young FBI underling, and Amy Brenneman is badly wasted on a thinly written character who makes a series of inexplicable decisions that get her roped into an awkwardly tacked-on subplot. (This could maybe have been a lean and mean two-hour movie, but at seven episodes that often top an hour each, it drags.) The Old Man seems to be shooting for something tense and riveting like Homeland or The Americans, but it doesn’t deliver the depth or nuance needed to bring us along for the ride.

THE TVLINE BOTTOM LINE: Jeff Bridges and John Lithgow make a great duo in FX’s The Old Man, but the tangled plot doesn’t live up to their billing.

Published
Categorized as Reviews

Stranger Things Review: Season 4 Is Every Bit the Win That Embattled Netflix Needs Right Now

By the time Part 1 of Stranger Things’ Season 4 drops on Friday, May 27, 1,058 days will have gone by. And that is one long-ass time between seasons of any show, however bitchin’ it may be. But I come bearing good, even awesome, news: Pandemic delays be damned, the seven super-sized episodes that we get are 100-percent worth the wait.

The timing of the Netflix hit’s triumphant return couldn’t be better for the streamer, which has been hard-pressed for good news lately. In the first quarter of 2022, it suffered its first subscriber loss in a decade, which led to stock prices taking a nosedive, which in turn led to layoffs and an overall financial reckoning.

Yeah, there haven’t been a lotta champagne bottles being popped. But there should be after the world gets a load of Season 4.

You probably already know that in the show’s penultimate run, six months have passed since the Battle of Starcourt, bully Billy’s unlikely hero’s death and Eleven’s loss of her powers. (Read the Season 3 finale recap here.) You also know from the trailer (which you can view here) and episodic photos (which you can view here) that there’s a new creature at large, one that comes closer to looking human than the Demogorgon could in its dreams.

What you don’t know — yet, at least — is that Season 4 continues to find the Duffer Brothers at the absolute top of their game. The series’ creators have done a bang-up job of letting their kids mature and experience all the pains that accompany growing up — and, in some cases, growing apart. They’ve shaken up couples to reveal what they’re actually made of. And the supernatural mystery that the EPs have set in motion is, blessed as it is with a central character about whom we care deeply, as likely to turn you inside out as, ahem, upside down.

stranger things season 4 part 1 reviewOn top of that, Part 1 of Season 4 reminds us over and over again that few and far between are the series that are better (or even as good) at staging jaw-dropping set pieces. It reinforces the fact that you can drop any assortment of Stranger Things’ characters into an arc and feel like you’re witnessing chocolate being dipped in peanut butter for the first time. And we can’t fathom how, but the show keeps introducing newbies that are instantly iconic. (Yeah, we’re pretty high on scene-stealing stoner Argyle!)

In short, unless you’re for some reason dying for a reinvention of the wheel, you’re gonna love this. It’s suspenseful, exciting, funny and scary as hell.

THE TVLINE BOTTOM LINE: As Argyle would say, “Hold onto your butts, brochachos!” Stranger Things, Season 4, Part 1, is an awesomely wild ride.

Published
Categorized as Reviews

Conversations With Friends Review: Hulu’s Infidelity Tale From Normal People Team Sizzles, Then Fizzles

Hulu’s Sally Rooney book adaptation Normal People was my absolute favorite TV show of 2020: a magnificently moving, beautifully rendered portrait of young love, with all its dizzying highs and lows. So I was excited when I heard Hulu was adapting another Rooney novel, Conversations With Friends, and bringing back Normal People director Lenny Abrahamson and writer Alice Birch to work on it as well. It debuts on Hulu this Sunday — I’ve seen all 12 episodes — but unfortunately, it falls short of the lofty heights its predecessor hit. Like the novel it’s based on, Hulu’s Conversations is initially intriguing but ultimately frustrating.

Conversations With Friends Hulu Bobbi FrancesThe story centers on Frances (Alison Oliver) and Bobbi (Sasha Lane), a pair of Dublin college students and ex-lovers who are complete opposites: Bobbi is the chatty, bohemian life of the party, while Frances is thoughtful and reserved. At a poetry reading, Bobbi catches the eye of married author Melissa (Jemima Kirke), and as they pair off, Frances forms a kinship with Melissa’s actor husband Nick (Joe Alwyn). Their two parallel crushes turn into something more, of course, and threaten the foundation of a marriage — and a friendship.

Rooney specializes in crafting relatable characters and natural dialogue in her books, and Conversations has the same grounded feel Normal People had, albeit slightly heightened and juicier this time. The conversations are brimming with subtext, punctuated by lots of longing looks and significant glances. Plus, the sex scenes have genuine heat to them, as Normal People‘s did; they feel real and intimate in a way we rarely see, leaving the participants sweaty and flushed and not entirely photogenic.

Conversations With Friends Hulu Melissa BobbiThe story unfolds along fairly predictable lines, though: the giddy rush of infidelity, followed by nagging guilt and jealousy. A picturesque seaside vacation acts as an emotional pressure cooker, and the early episodes hit on some messy, complicated truths about love and relationships. But the series meanders a bit after that initial rush and ends up getting stuck in narrative lulls and loops. It’s leisurely paced, to the point of being snoozy. (All those significant glances don’t add up to much of significance, really.) It’s true to life, you might say… but that doesn’t mean it’s dramatically satisfying.

It’s also a tall order for the actors to equal the stunning work done by Normal People stars Paul Mescal and Daisy Edgar-Jones. Oliver has a huge load to carry here in her first major role — the camera spends a lot of time on her face — and she carries it well, lending Frances a captivating vulnerability. Frances can be hard to read, though, which makes it harder for us to connect with her, and with the show’s narrow focus on her, it all starts to feel a bit claustrophobic. (Frances’ home life is dreary, with an unreliable alcoholic dad and a mysterious health issue.)

Conversations With Friends Hulu Nick Joe AlwynAlwyn, who will likely draw fans to this project simply by being Taylor Swift’s boyfriend, makes a dashing romantic lead as Nick, but his scenes with Oliver’s Frances fall into a repetitive rut after a while. The story could use more of Bobbi and Melissa to spice things up, but Kirke barely makes more than a cameo as Melissa, and Lane’s Bobbi is seriously underwritten — more of a symbol than a fully realized character. Conversations is dutifully faithful to Rooney’s prose, as Normal People was, but that means it suffers from the same flaws, too. It’s still a notch or two above your average romantic drama and offers some smart emotional insight along the way, but in the end, it’s a fleeting dalliance that fades too quickly.

THE TVLINE BOTTOM LINE: Hulu’s intriguing but frustrating book adaptation Conversations With Friends can’t quite match the heights of Normal People.

Published
Categorized as Reviews

Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Review: A Lighter Touch and a Throwback Vibe Make the Trek Franchise Fun Again

Star Trek TV shows are multiplying like Tribbles these days. Starting with 2017’s Star Trek: Discovery — the first Trek show in more than a decade — the iconic sci-fi franchise has rolled out five new shows on Paramount+ in the past five years. As a lifelong Trekkie, it’s been a pleasure to navigate this wealth of Trek content, but I also have to be honest: It hasn’t always been smooth sailing.

Both Discovery and the Next Generation sequel series Star Trek: Picard started out strong before running into narrative quicksand in later seasons. (Discovery has become relentlessly grandiose, with endless speeches about the glories of space travel, and Picard has gotten head-spinningly complicated.) It’s a relief, then, that the latest Trek offering, Star Trek: Strange New Worlds — premiering this Thursday on the streamer; I’ve seen the first five episodes — gets back to basics, closely hewing to classic Trek with an old-school vibe and an episodic alien-of-the-week format. (It even brings back the traditional uniforms and opening narration from the original series.) It’s a throwback, to be sure… and a welcome one.

Celia Rose Gooding in Star Trek: Strange New WorldsStrange New Worlds finds Christopher Pike (Anson Mount) — Kirk’s predecessor as captain of the Enterprise, who played a major role in Season 2 of Discovery — in a snowy Montana cabin, casting him as the archetypal reluctant hero called back to duty to rescue an old friend. That call puts him back in the Enterprise‘s captain’s chair, flanked by his first officer Number One (Rebecca Romijn), science officer Spock (Ethan Peck) and wide-eyed cadet Uhura (Celia Rose Gooding).

We get a few passing mentions of Discovery‘s Michael Burnham, but Strange New Worlds mostly charts its own course with clear-cut missions and a new planet/alien/mystery each week, while still weaving in a few serialized strands throughout. The weekly format keeps it light and nimble, and it doesn’t get bogged down by impenetrably dense technobabble like Discovery and Picard do, opting instead for light comedy, fist fights and eye-candy special effects like a thrilling chase through an asteroid belt. It’s more personal and physical, less cosmic and cerebral.

Star Trek Strange New Worlds Pike Anson MountIt also assembles maybe the strongest crew of the current Trek series. Mount makes a terrific captain, with a commanding presence and a twinkle in his eye that recalls William Shatner’s Kirk. He was a great addition on Discovery, and he gets to go even deeper here, with Pike unable to shake a haunting vision of his tragic future. The iconic role of Spock is in good hands with Peck, and we get to see a sexier side of the logical Vulcan through his encounters with girlfriend T’Pring. Plus, Gooding brings fresh life to Uhura, and Jess Bush is appealingly snarky as Nurse Chapel. Episode 2 even takes time out for a chummy crew dinner that helps deepens our understanding of these characters, and other crew members hint at more connections to classic Star Trek lore.

A warning, though (or a red alert, I suppose): The standalone stories are just OK so far. The early episodes are pretty standard sci-fi fare: the mysterious object with formidable powers; the mysterious virus that infects the whole crew. I’d like to see these new worlds get a bit more strange. (Episode 4, though, is an effectively tense thriller, as the Enterprise faces off against the ruthless Gorn alien race in a stripped-down space battle.) There’s nothing here yet that stacks up against the very best episodes of the original Star Trek or Next Generation… but then again, that may be an unfairly high bar to reach this early on. It’s off to a promising start, with a solid crew brimming with potential. By going back to the past, Strange New Worlds points the way to a brighter future.

THE TVLINE BOTTOM LINE: Star Trek: Strange New Worlds gets back to basics with an old-school, episodic format that reinvigorates the franchise.

Published
Categorized as Reviews

Netflix’s Heartstopper: The Love Story We Needed Decades Ago… and Today

OK, Ausiello, you were right. Heartstopper was amazing. Beyond.

When my boss told me to watch Netflix’s teenage romance, insisting that I’d like it, I said what I usually do when he makes suggestions — “Mm-hmm, mm-hmm, you betcha” — with every intention of ignoring him. But this week, I gave it a shot. Dunno what possessed me, really. Too much wine? The last thing I wanted to do was sit through a show that Michael had described as “really sweet.” Life, it seemed to me, had become too ugly, too cold and relentless and f—king insane. I didn’t want to spend any time with an alternative that didn’t really exist and maybe couldn’t anymore.

It turned out that I needed Heartstopper. Badly. Its story, if you don’t already know, is pretty simple: Gay boy meets straight boy, straight boy realizes that he’s bisexual, love blossoms, sometimes literally, all around them. But it’s written so earnestly, acted so deftly and directed so thrillingly that its impact is profound. There is a joy to these eight episodes, to their gentleness and tension, that radiates too brightly to be rejected. They comprise four hours of happiness and hope.

And yes, Michael, they are “really sweet.”

Heartstopper was exactly what I was so reluctant to admit that I needed after how many years now of absorbing blow after blow, from the pandemic to politics to almost hourly upheaval. It also occurred to me, as I zipped through episodes that went by so fast, I would’ve sworn they were 10 minutes apiece, that this series is going to mean a lot to a whole lotta kids. At a time when hateful “Don’t Say Gay” bills are giving them the impression that being anything but straight is wrong, something shameful that’s to be hidden, here comes Heartstopper, with its sensitivity and insight, to reassure them that nope, “different” isn’t wrong, it’s just different. It can also be pretty magnificent.

I can’t imagine how vastly my childhood and adolescence would have been changed for the better, had there been a show like Heartstopper around all those decades ago. Growing up is confusing, as it is, and growing up without any idea that what you are is something that exists, and that it’s OK, scary as hell. But I’m not here to play “If only… ” I’m here to say, “Thank goodness — Heartstopper is here, better late than never.”

Published
Categorized as Reviews

Gaslit Review: Starz’s Watergate Docudrama Dares to Be Weird

You’re not imagining things: We are positively drowning in TV docudramas these days. The Girl From Plainville, Inventing Anna, The Dropout, The First Lady… if it made headlines or inspired a podcast, it’s probably on TV right now, with big stars lining up to play famous real-life figures (and earn an easy Emmy nomination). So I couldn’t blame you if you cast a weary eye in the direction of Starz’s Gaslit — premiering this Sunday at 8/7c; I’ve seen the first four episodes — especially since the story of the Watergate scandal has been told and retold since the days of All the President’s Men. Gaslit manages to nimbly sidestep the pitfalls that so many TV docudramas fall into, though, finding a weird, funny angle that helps it stand out from the pack.

Gaslit Starz John Dean Dan Stevens Mo Betty GilpinBased on (yes) the podcast Slow Burn, Gaslit opens five months before the Watergate break-in, with Julia Roberts as Martha Mitchell, the socialite wife of Richard Nixon’s attorney general John Mitchell (Sean Penn). When John begins plotting a covert operation against Nixon’s Democratic rivals, White House lawyer John Dean (a slick Dan Stevens) brings in a tough talker named G. Gordon Liddy (Shea Whigham)… and all hell breaks loose. We know that Watergate was a Very Serious historical event, but Gaslit flips all that on its head by playing the break-in as a bumbling comedy of errors — a group of Keystone Kops led by a raving madman. Lies pile on top of lies and alibis get bungled as cascading twists of fate culminate in the biggest political scandal of the century.

Gaslit hails from Mr. Robot writer Robbie Pickering, with Sam Esmail also on board as an executive producer, and it combines that show’s cerebral, oddball vibe with a dash of Veep‘s foul-mouthed cynicism. It’s proudly bizarre, and it wisely avoids the stagnant history lessons doled out by inferior docudramas like Showtime’s The First Lady. It tells a story, first and foremost, where people actually talk like human beings and not like wax figures in a museum. It injects goofy humor into the mix, too, like when the Watergate robbers debate the merits of a windbreaker versus a jacket while they’re mid-felony.

Gaslit Starz G. Gordon Liddy Shea WhighamIt’s also assembled a remarkable cast that’s ten-deep with serious talent. As Martha, Roberts is a honey-voiced schmoozer who loves the camera, and the role takes full advantage of her natural radiance. Penn is unrecognizable in a bald wig and fat suit as John Mitchell, but he still finds the humanity in him, and he and Roberts have a natural rapport as husband and wife. Plus, familiar faces like Chris Messina and Patton Oswalt pop up around the edges. But the true highlight is Whigham — a seasoned TV veteran from Boardwalk Empire and Perry Mason — who is delightfully unhinged here as Liddy: aggressively macho and wildly insecure, with a disturbing taste for casual violence. (“You’ve never tasted your own blood. I can tell,” he taunts a Mitchell staffer at one point.)

Gaslit does take a dark turn when, immediately after the break-in, Martha is kept captive under house arrest so she won’t blab to the press. These ugly scenes don’t fit with the rest of the series, and the abrupt clash of tones is jarring. (It doesn’t help that Martha’s captor is played by Brian Geraghty, who also plays a sadistic kidnapper on ABC’s Big Sky.) Mostly, though, Gaslit is a wickedly entertaining and irreverent look at an infamous slice of American history that none of these characters are particularly proud to be a part of.

THE TVLINE BOTTOM LINE: With an excellent cast and a goofy sense of humor, Starz’s Watergate saga Gaslit is a cut above the standard TV docudrama.

Published
Categorized as Reviews

Russian Doll Season 2 Review: Natasha Lyonne Is Still a Treasure as Her Netflix Comedy Finds a New Wrinkle in Time

Russian Doll was such a fizzy breath of fresh air when it premiered, with Natasha Lyonne’s Nadia getting stuck in a time loop and forced to relive her 36th birthday over and over again, that I wasn’t even sure I wanted it to come back for a second season. After all, TV shows that take a promising idea and run it into the ground can become like frustrating time loops themselves. But I’m happy to report that Season 2 of the Netflix comedy — premiering next Wednesday, April 20; I’ve seen all seven episodes — is a very worthy follow-up, finding a new time-tripping premise that recaptures the sci-fi fun of Season 1. Most importantly, though, it serves as a fantastic showcase for Lyonne, who once again delivers one of the best and funniest performances anywhere on TV.

We pick up four years later, with Nadia free from her time loop, preparing for her 40th birthday and playing caretaker to her ailing old pal Ruth. One night, she innocently gets on the subway and notices a poster for Sophie’s Choice and ads for Tab soda. What in the name of Ed Koch is going on around here? Eventually, Nadia figures it out: The subway has acted like a time machine, taking her back to they grimy old days of 1982 NYC and thrusting her into a complicated family saga that involves a stolen stash of gold Krugerrands and stretches back even decades further than that.

Russian Doll Season 2 Annie MurphyIf Season 1 was like Groundhog Day, Season 2 is more like Quantum Leap meets Back to the Future, with unforeseen complications sending fresh ripples through the space-time continuum. There are extra wrinkles here that I can’t reveal, with Schitt’s Creek alum Annie Murphy joining the cast in a secret role and Nadia’s adventures extending all the way to Budapest. She also discovers that mysteries are a lot harder to solve without the Internet. (She has to consult a library’s card catalog!) She’s pretty chill about the whole thing, though — “Inexplicable things happening is my entire modus operandi,” she quips — and we get to enjoy unraveling the mystery along with her. Thankfully, this is an economical binge, too: seven half-hour episodes, which is a blessing these days.

More than anything, Season 2 is a reminder of how terrific Lyonne is as Nadia; it’s really one of the best comedic TV performances in recent years. She’s thoroughly entertaining here, fumbling her way through the 1980s with her distinctively raspy Noo Yawk accent while dropping hot stock tips and too-early Cheers references. Nearly every word that comes out of her mouth is funny, and even when there’s no one else in the scene with her, she mumbles funny things to herself. (Just listen to the way she says “cock-a-roach,” and savor it.) But Lyonne has genuinely poignant moments as well, as Nadia excavates layers of trauma and stares down the barrel of her own dark and twisted family legacy. Attention, Emmy voters: You nominated Lyonne last season, but she really deserves to take it home this year.

Russian Doll Season 2 AlanRussian Doll does lose a bit of steam whenever Lyonne isn’t on screen: Her fastidious time-loop companion Alan, played by Charlie Barnett, isn’t as compelling a protagonist as Nadia — but to be fair, no one is. And at first, I thought that maybe this season’s mystery was getting overly ambitious and convoluted, throwing all kinds of historical eras and locations at us. But the international time-travel shenanigans do lend a cosmic significance to Nadia’s story and allow for eye-popping set pieces like a supremely drugged-out European dance party, and it all ties together in the end in a supremely satisfying (and mind-blowing) finale. This show is truly a gift, and if Season 2 is any indication, it can keep on reinventing itself for years and years to come.

THE TVLINE BOTTOM LINE: Netflix’s time-tripping comedy Russian Doll is just as good in Season 2, with an Emmy-worthy performance from Natasha Lyonne.

Published
Categorized as Reviews

Moon Knight Review: Disney+’s Most Original Marvel Series Is Also the Most Visually Exciting One Yet

Sometimes a lack of expectations can be a good thing.

Disney+’s Moon Knight is the streamer’s first live-action Marvel series to not spin off a character and actor already established by the blockbuster MCUfranchise. In addition to that, Moon Knight in his own right is not quite “obscure,” but certainly less well known than the Marvel characters who thus far have merited their own Disney+ showcase.

But it is that low-key profile, coupled with the main character’s rather complicated issues (Marc Spector struggles with dissociative identity disorder, aka DID), that sets the stage for Moon Knight to subvert and perhaps wildly exceed any tempered expectations you have — and that, I am delighted to report, it absolutely does.

Under Jeremy Slater (The Umbrella Academy) as head writer and premiering Wednesday, March 30, Moon Knight stars Oscar Isaac (Star Wars Episodes VII through IX) as Steven Grant, a nebbishy museum gift shop employee who is prone to blackouts/lost time; as such, he does his best to cuff himself to bed each night. We very soon realize that this sad sack lives with DID, and the host personality belongs to an infamous mercenary named Marc Spector.

Complicating Steven’s life even further is that fact that his alter is the latest vessel for — stick with me here — Khonshu, an Egyptian god who forces Marc to atone for his killy past by avenging the innocent. Ergo the wild, nocturnal outings of which Steven has barely any awareness.

Moon Knight

On the flip side… Ethan Hawke’s Arthur Harrow, who has big CLE (cult leader energy), does the bidding of the Egyptian god Ammit, by more proactively heading people’s bad deeds off at the pass. He does so via a simple ritual in which he holds a stranger’s hands and lets an animated “scales of justice” tattoo on his forearm judge them on the spot.

Not everyone who meets Harrow walks away alive.

Rounding out the series’ rather compact cast is May Calamawy (Ramy) as Layla El-Faouly, a woman who is in alliance with Marc and thus cannot fathom why Steven “plays dumb” with her when their paths cross, and the late Gaspard Ulliel (Twice Upon a Time) as enigmatic antiquities collector Anton Mogart.

Moon Knight HawkeNone of the above is a spoiler, and most of it is covered in the six-episode series’ opening acts. (TVLine binged the four episodes made available to critics.) And while it definitely will benefit your viewing experience to have these broad strokes in front of your eyeballs now, the fact is that Moon Knight remains wonderfully unpredictable every step of the way.

You knew that Falcon and Winter Soldier was about Sam Wilson accepting his new legacy. You knew that Hawkeye was about Clint Barton tending to some unfinished business and getting home in time for Christmas.

You do not know where Moon Knight will take you. And I promise you that if you form any back-of-napkin theory, the end of the fourth episode will blow it up in spectacular fashion.

Moon KnightThe joy in watching Moon Knight actually comes from what a few have opined are its liabilities — it has no connection to existing MCU fare and thus is not beholden to scattering Easter eggs or checking off boxes (though one familiar geographic location is name-dropped). That frees the viewer up to experience Moon Knight for what it is, a rollicking yarn that is one part Venom (as voiced by F. Murray Abraham, Khonshu is a bit of a dick!), one part Split, two parts Indiana Jones and… at least one other part.

Visually, the early episodes wind us through London — ergo Isaac’s accent for Steven, which has invited derision but helpfully flags which alter is speaking at any given moment — and other distinct locales, allowing for set pieces unlike anything else in Disney+’s TV MCU. The visual effects are in steady supply but always feel organic versus churned from the keyboard of a PC, including when Moon Knight elects to “suit up,” the clever ways Steven and Marc converse through reflective surfaces, or when Harrow summons very bad things.

Marvel chief Kevin Feige has attested that Moon Knight is “loud and brutal” and as such marks a “tonal shift” for the MCU fare being produced for Disney+. And while, yes, the character does, to cite one example, ruthlessly whale on a bevy of goons who get sicced on him at one point, the violence is not gore-based but simply stone-cold, efficient kills.

Oscar Isaac is doing yeoman’s work here; the first episode alone is one mother of a roller coaster for his character, and he frankly makes us worried for Steven’s marbles. Hawke, speaking softly and rocking scraggly hair, keeps you guessing about Harrow’s next move. Calamawy, from go, slips nicely into adventure hero mode and is pulled into her own brawls along the way, while Ulliel has a striking presence that serves his character well.

THE TVLINE BOTTOM LINE: And now for something completely different… Moon Knight arrives just in time to shake up the Disney+/Marvel formula.

Published
Categorized as Reviews